Comparison
| Company | Rating | Earnings power | Cash/financial position | Main risks | Next KPIs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota | A | High | Very strong | Tariffs, North America losses, rising costs | North America profit, tariff impact, operating CF |
| Honda | B | Reported loss, adjusted profit positive | Motorcycles and finance support the group | EV losses, four-wheel business, China/Asia | Adjusted OP, EV losses, motorcycle profit |
| SUBARU | B | Recovery after sharp decline | Needs confirmation | North America concentration, tariffs, incentives | U.S. sales, operating margin, inventory |
| Nissan | C | Very thin | Liquidity exists but losses remain | Restructuring, low margin, no dividend | Operating margin, FCF, product launches |
Key issues
U.S. tariffs directly cut margins
Tariffs are not a minor one-time factor. They change how investors should read Japanese automakers with North American exposure.
EV is now a profit-management issue
Honda's large EV-related losses show that EV is no longer only a growth theme. The issue is who can recognize losses early and reallocate capital effectively.
HEV demand helps, but does not solve everything
Hybrid strength is positive for Toyota and Honda, but it must offset tariffs, incentives, China/Asia competition, R&D, and EV losses.
Sales finance also matters
Toyota and Honda have financial-services businesses. Interest income, credit costs, residual values, and funding costs can affect group profit.
Company notes
Toyota Motor (7203)
Toyota has the strongest scale, cash flow, HEV supply chain, and financial resilience. It is resilient to tariffs, but not immune. North American profitability and cost control are the next checks.
Provisional rating: A.
Honda Motor (7267)
Honda's surface loss is heavily affected by EV-related losses. Motorcycles remain strong, but four-wheel recovery and EV-loss reduction need confirmation.
Provisional rating: B.
SUBARU (7270)
SUBARU has lower China risk but higher North America concentration. Tariffs, inventories, and incentives can quickly affect margins.
Provisional rating: B.
Nissan Motor (7201)
Nissan's operating margin remains very thin. The issue is whether the margin can return toward 1%, 2%, and 3% in a credible way.
Provisional rating: C.
Overall view
Toyota is the core candidate. Honda and SUBARU are conditional. Nissan remains cautious. The sector should be evaluated in this order: tariff impact, operating margin, adjusted profit, operating CF/FCF, and ROIC spread.